Myths and truths in open relationships

Open relationships are a relationship model for all those people who cannot find themselves comfortable or happy in a monogamous relationship due to routine, jealousy, lies and the fact of feeling bad if you feel desire for people other than your partner.

The irreverent sixties brought back something that seemed eradicated from Western society: explicit polygamy. From many fronts they began to name it in different ways: polyamory, polyfidelity, confluent love or simply free love. Currently, everything seems to be encompassed in the term that refers to open relationships.

It is a form of relationship in which Each person can have sexual relations with third parties outside the couple. In addition, you would have full consent from your partner. There are no fixed rules. Each couple determines how and to what extent these agreements reach.

The controversy of open relationships

The issue remains controversial. Many wonder if couples with open relationships are really happier, more mature and solid.. Others indicate that the objective of these links is not stability, maturity or solidity. Therefore, there would be no need for debate. Perhaps it would be more valid to ask if this type of relationship really guarantees greater freedom and, consequently, greater happiness for the couple.

Human sexuality is a field that is located halfway between biology and culture.instinct,

Culture places limits on some of our instincts, causing us to be ashamed of them and repress them. Culturally and, particularly due to religions, sex became taboo throughout history. By controlling the sexual desire of societies, ideologies and powers, they also controlled the worldview of their subjects..

Open relationships, yes or no?

The sexologist Ana de Callea couples therapist in Spain, indicates that Open relationships are generally not an option for younger people. . People with some type of journey or experience with several couples come to this model. Which, generally, have been negative.

It also indicates that It is almost always men who propose this type of bond. And in some cases they are putting on the table not their desire for freedom, but their need to be with a disguised homosexuality. Hence they need other men to be involved with their partner.

Open relationships may also be covering up an emotional problem. Is it a cynical solution to the eternal disagreement that is implicit in love? In some cases it is. The difficulty in establishing deep bonds of intimacy with other people is something that in an open relationship can be buried and forgotten.thus contributing to avoiding the internal conflict as such.

Open relationships: other data of interest

There are not enough studies that document with certainty what the fate of open relationships is. Or that allow them to be compared with traditional couples. What is certain is that family models have changed profoundly in recent decades.

It is also true that every relationship does not depend on the bond itself, but on the human quality of those who make it up. About your beliefs, your values ​​and your priorities. That’s why, open relationships They are not for everyone, especially when they are not based on love or sincere communication.

Along these lines, researchers Easton, D., Hardy, JW, & Vagalume, M. (2016) point out that, many times, today, the important thing would be to create a bond of affection and commitment with a particular person. Meanwhile, several sexual links could be created with third parties. They could be created as long as they did not affect the integrity of the first two.

Besides, sexual liberation and new social rights have radically changed the concept of relationship, sexuality and fidelity. Therefore, many couples satisfy their sexual needs outside the couple, with the consent of the other member, to recover from the routine, for example.

Someone might say: If there is that love and sincere communication, why involve third parties? Others will respond that nothing protects a couple from routine, from the desire to experiment, from the need to feel the excitement of the new. Then, again he would be questioned to ask if all of this is not rather an expression of a certain futile adolescence that one does not want to give up. The debate continues…

You might be interested…